JNSS 2014, 5(1-2):39-54 | DOI: 10.32725/jnss.2014.005

Applicability of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a tool for determining benefits for special aids and equipment in the social sector

Olga Švestková1,*, Kateřina Svěcená1,2
1 Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Czech Republic
2 University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, Department of Preclinical and Clinical Disciplines, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) has wide application in the field of rehabilitation. To date, it has been the only tool to combine health and the social view of the patient in the area of services provided. It defines not only the aetiological diagnosis, but also the functional condition of the patient and their participation in society in relation to environmental factors. With the correct enactment in health and social legislation, this classification can be used to provide an effective tool for determining the necessary long-term social services and benefits. In the rehabilitation process of patients/clients in the Czech Republic, the interconnection and coordination of medical and social components is still lacking. Throughout its domains, the ICF covers the area of activities and participation in conjunction with environmental factors. Evaluation of environmental factors is the domain of an occupational therapist. This study focuses primarily on the practical use of the ICF in the area covered by the Act regulating the provision of benefits for special aids and equipment. This act defines the requirements for special aids and equipment for persons with severe disorders of the supporting or musculoskeletal system (modification of motor vehicles, apartment remodelling, special modifications of computers, portable ramps, stair climbers, loadings skids and stair lifts (including installation), requirements for special aids and equipment for the severely visually and hearing impaired. In this study, we focus mainly on the use of the ICF for assessing the entitlement to special aids and equipment for persons with serious disorders of the supporting and musculoskeletal systems, wherein 30 clients were coded using the ICF, activities and participations were determined, including the resulting facilitators or barriers of the environment (environmental factors) that have a major impact on the client's self-sufficiency, their opportunity to live in their home environment and to achieve the maximum possible quality of life.

Keywords: activity; participation; environmental factors; functioning; facilitators and barriers; quality of life

Received: May 23, 2014; Accepted: June 30, 2014; Published: March 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Švestková O, Svěcená K. Applicability of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a tool for determining benefits for special aids and equipment in the social sector. Journal of Nursing, Social Studies, Public Health and Rehabilitation. 2014;5(1-2):39-54. doi: 10.32725/jnss.2014.005.
Download citation

References

  1. Act 155/1995 Coll. Zákon o důchodovém pojištění [Pension insurance Act]. In: Sbírka zakonů České republiky (Czech).
  2. Barnes MP (1999). Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. British Medical Bulletin. 55/4: 927-943. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Cameron J, Walker C, Hart A, Sadlo G, Haslam I, Retain Support Group (2012). Supporting workers with mental health problems to retain employment: Users experience of a UK job retention project. Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment and Rehabilitation. 42/4: 461-471. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Carney N, Chesnut RM, Maynard H, Mann NC, Patterson P, Hefland M (1999). Effect of cognitive rehabilitation on outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 14/3: 277-307. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Cieza A, Stucki G (2005). Content Comparison of health related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Quality of Life Research. 14/5: 1225-1237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Decree No. 284/1995 Coll. Vyhláška, kterou se provádí zákon o důchodovém pojištění [Decree implementing the law on Pension Insurance]. In: Sbírka zákonů České republiky (Czech).
  7. Decree No. 388/2011 Coll. Vyhláška o provedení některých ustanovení zákona o poskytování dávek osobám se zdravotním postižením [Decree implementing the certain provisions of the law on providing of benefits to persons with disabilities]. In: Sbírka zákonů České republiky (Czech).
  8. Decree No. 391/2011 Coll. Vyhláška č. 391/2011 Sb., kterou se mění vyhláška č. 505/2006 Sb., kterou se provádějí některá ustanovení zákona o sociálních službách, ve znění pozdějších předpisů [Decree No. 391/2011 amending Decree No. 505/2006 Coll., Implementing certain provisions of the Social Services Act, as amended]. In: Sbírka zákonů České republiky (Czech).
  9. Decree No. 440/2001 Coll. Vyhláška o odškodňování bolesti a ztížení společenského uplatnění [Decree on compensation pain and social impairment]. In: Sbírka zákonů České republiky (Czech).
  10. Doig E, Fleming J, Tooth L (2001). Patterns of community integration 2-5 years post-discharge from brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury. 15/9: 747-762. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Eldar R, Kullmann L, Marincek C, Sekelj-Kauzlaric K, Svestkova O, Palat M (2008). Rehabilitation medicine in countries of Central /Eastern Europe. Disability and Rehabilitation. 30/2: 134-141. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Geurtsen GJ, Van Heugten CM, Martina JD, Geurts AC (2010). Comprehensive rehabilitation programmes in the chronic phase after severe brain injury: a systematic review. Rehabilitation Medicine. 42/2: 97-110. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Howard D, Nieuwenhuijsen R, Saleeby P (2008). Health promotion and education of the ICF in the US and Canada using an ecological perpective. Disability and Health. 30/12-13: 942-954. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kreutzer JS, Gervasio AH, Camplair PS (1994). Primary caregivers' psychological status and family functioning after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 8/3: 197-210. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Luciano JV, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Aguado J, Fernandez A, Serrano-Blanco A, Roca M, Haro JM (2010). Research Article The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II): a nonparametric item response analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 10: 45. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Mach J (2014). Metodika nejvyššího soudu k náhradě nemajetkové újmy na zdraví [Methodology of the Supreme Court for compensation for personal injury claims]. Tempus Medicorum, časopis České lékařské komory. 23/6: 40-41 (Czech).
  17. Martinuzzi A, Frare M, Pradal M, Dugone S, Durante M, Corb A, Francescutti C, Leonardi M (2008). Disseminating the WHO International Classification of functioning, health and disability in the Veneto region in Italy. Disability and Rehabilitation. 30/1: 71-80. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. McArdle R, Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, Wilson RH, Doyle P J (2005). The WHO-DAS II: measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults. Trends in Amplification. 9/3: 127-143. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Murray M, Camen C, Spierer L, Clarke S (2008). Plasticity in representation of environmental sounds relevated by electrical neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 39/2: 847-856. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. New Zealand Guidelines Group (2007). Evidence based best practice guidline summary. Traumatic Brain Injury: Diagnosis, Acute Management and Rehabilitation. New Zealand. New Zealand Guidelines group, 40 p.
  21. Pereborn RJM, Chorus AMJ (2003). Measuring participation acording to the International Classification of functioning. Disability and Rehabilitation. 25/11-12: 577-587. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Peterson D (2005). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): an introduction for rehabilitation psychologists. Rehabilitation Psychology. American APA Division. 50/2: 105-112. Go to original source...
  23. Regulation No. 89/2012 Coll. Občanský zákoník [The Civil Code]. In: Sbírka zákonů České republiky (Czech).
  24. Regulation No. 108/2006 Coll. Zákon o sociálních službách [The Social Services Act]. In: Sbírka zákonů České republiky (Czech).
  25. Regulation No. 329/2011 Coll. Zákon o poskytování dávek osobám se zdravotním postižením a o změně souvisejících zákonů [The Act to provide benefits to persons with disabilities, and amending related laws]. In: Sbírka zákonů České republiky (Czech).
  26. Schuntermann MF (1996). The international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps (ICIDH) - results and problems. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 19/1: 1-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Steinert Y (2005). Learning together to teach together: Interprofessional education and faculty development. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 19/1: 60-75. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Bedirhan Üstün T (2002). Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disability and Rehabilitation. 24/5: 281-282. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Švestková O (2007). Funkční diagnostika patofyziologických projevů u osob po traumatickém poranění mozku, jejich objektivizace a subjektivní hodnocení (s použitím Mezinárodní klasifikace funkčních schopností, disability a zdraví WHO) - dizertace [Functional diagnostic of pathophysiological manifestations in patients after traumatic brain injury, their objective and subjective evaluation (using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health WHO) - dissertation]. Praha: 1. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy (Czech).
  30. Švestková O, Pfeiffer J (2009). Funkční hodnocení (diagnostika) v rehabilitaci [Functional Assessment (diagnostic) in rehabilitation]. Praktický lékař. 89/5: 268-271 (Czech).
  31. Švestková O, Angerová Y, Sládková P (2009). Mezinárodní klasifikace funkčních schopností, disability a zdraví (ICF) - kvantitativní měření kapacity a výkonu [International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) - a quantitative measurement of capacity and performance]. Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie. 72/105/6: 580-586 (Czech).
  32. WHO (2001). International Classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO, 297 p.
  33. WHO (2008). Mezinárodní klasifikace funkčních schopností, disability a zdraví [International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health]. 1st ed. Praha. Grada, 278 p. (Czech).
  34. Zdravotnické noviny (2014). Odškodňování újmy na zdraví ne skrze diagnózu, ale skrze reálný život [Compensation for of personal injury not through diagnosis, but through real life]. Zdravotnické noviny. 63/9 (Czech).
  35. Zvoníková A, Čeledová L, Čevela R (2010). Základy posuzování invalidity [Fundamentals of the assessing of the invalidity]. 1st ed. Praha: Grada, 357 p. (Czech).

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.